Previous | TOC | Next
Overview
On July 13, 1998, a full-page advertisement promoting the "ex-gay" movement
ran in The New York Times.2 Featuring
Anne Paulk - billed as a wife, mother, and a former lesbian, and pictured
wearing a sparkling solitaire diamond engagement ring with a wedding
band - the ad claimed that homosexuals can become heterosexual by accepting
Jesus Christ and repenting their sins. The New York Times ad was
followed by similar ads, in USA Today featuring professional football
player Reggie White, and in The Washington Post featuring a group
of ex-gay leaders.3 The $206,000
ad campaign sparked a media firestorm which resulted in the largest public
exposure that the ex-gay movement has ever received.4
The ads were purchased by a well-coordinated and well-financed coalition
of fifteen Christian Right and ex-gay organizations, including the Family
Research Council, the Christian Coalition, Concerned Women for America,
Kerusso Ministries, and the American Family Association. They represent
a re-framing by the Christian Right of its long-standing condemnation
of homosexuality and opposition to gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender rights.
By elevating the ex-gay movement, the Christian Right has shifted its
message to a model of preaching personal salvation for homosexuals.5 "Calling
homosexual behavior sin is not anti-gay, it's pro-life," reads one
ad. "Thousands of homosexuals can celebrate a new life because someone
cared enough to share with them the truth of God's healing love," reads
another. But behind this mask of compassion, the anti-gay and authoritarian
agenda of the Right remains unchanged. This report locates the ex-gay
movement in the context in which it belongs: as part of the Right's larger
social change movement, which promotes an agenda of sweeping social,
political, cultural, and economic changes.
The ex-gay movement is an international network that claims gay men
and lesbians can be "converted" to heterosexuality through "submission
to Jesus Christ" or through secular "reparative therapy." During
the past two decades, the ex-gay movement has operated as part of, but
separate from, the Christian Right. For years, ex-gay leaders had difficulty
convincing churches and Christian Right organizations to support ex-gay
ministries, since ex-gay leaders still carried the stigma of homosexuality.
The Right's position of outright condemnation of homosexuality kept it
from comfortably embracing anyone who had been gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender.
Programs of psychotherapy that attempt to "cure" homosexuals,
known as "conversion therapy" or "reparative therapy," date
back several decades, but only in the last few years has the Christian
Right fully accepted the ex-gay movement and subsequently catapulted "gay
conversion" onto the screen of national public debate.6 It
did so when outright condemnation began to fail as a political message,
creating the need for a new and more effective way to reach people. Christian
Right organizations had not realized the political opportunities that
a partnership with the ex-gay movement would bring, especially the political
benefit of borrowing the notion of reparative therapy from the secular
Right, which has long been a proponent of conversion therapy for homosexuals. Reparative therapy has been widely repudiated by the American Psychological
Association and other mainstream mental health organizations. However,
Christian Right leaders are undeterred in their zeal to use the ex-gay
movement for political gain. This report details the political agenda
that a partnership between the Christian Right and the ex-gay movement
promotes. It also refutes the claim by the Christian Right that its views
on homosexuality reflect those of most Christians and Americans of other
faiths.
The report reviews extensive evidence that:
n By re-framing its attack on homosexuality in kinder, gentler terms,
the Christian Right is putting forth a softer face that cloaks a
hard line agenda, which includes rolling back lesbian and gay civil
rights, enforcing criminal laws against gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender
people, and promoting a broader theocratic agenda based on a literal
interpretation of Biblical Scripture. Each aspect of this right-wing
political agenda represents a grave threat to democracy and diversity
in the US.
n The ex-gay movement lends political cover to the Right's hostile
political campaign against gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender people.
In fact, using the ex-gay movement is just the latest strategy in
the Right's decades-long attack on the gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender
community, and the ex-gay movement must be analyzed in this historical
context. If homosexuality is a "choice" that can be overcome,
then, it is argued, a "gay lifestyle" is voluntary and
therefore does not deserve protection under the Constitution.
n In asserting that homosexuality is a sin that can be overcome,
the Christian Right is at odds with many mainstream communities of
faith which advocate equal rights for lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender
people and also affirm their full religious equality.
A complex movement with many sectors, the Right has a multitude of infrastructure
organizations, including publishing houses, legal organizations, mass-based
organizations, think tanks, and funding organizations that consistently
provide the basic resources needed for the movement to survive and prosper.7 These
infrastructure organizations are able to respond quickly to political
opportunities, such as the emergence of the ex-gay movement. Collectively,
infrastructure organizations on the Right have formed an effective communications
network and a structure of support for the movement.8
In furtherance of its agenda, the Christian Right seeks to impose universal
standards of conduct based on its narrow interpretation of Biblical scripture
- which would denote the only legitimate and acceptable form of behavior
for all citizens.9 The Christian
Right is attempting to pressure the Republican Party to enact this agenda
through legislation, state regulations, and through media campaigns which
represent a crusade for "coercive purity."10 If
the Christian Right has its way, the result will be a form of Christian
nationalism that would tear down the walls separating church and state.
This vision is authoritarian, anti-democratic, and inconsistent with
the American tradition of pluralism, tolerance, and respect for difference.
The ex-gay movement subscribes to and serves the Right's broader vision Ok
to Download, Copy & Print:
Previous | TOC | Next |